Issue No. 21, February 1985
Confrontation - Sooner The Better
Custer's Last Stand The White Race is being pushed into its last stand. Whether it will end in a feeble whimper or a heroic confron-tation remains to be seen. General Phillip H. Shaidan is credited with the observation that "the only good Indian is a dead Indian." In July of 1874 he sent L.t. Col. George A. Custer on a special mission to wage war against the Plains Indians who had been raising havoc with the White settlers moving West. Gold had been discovered in the Black Hills of South Dakota and northeastern Wyoming. Emigration to the West was on the increase as the railroad spanned the continent from the Atlantic to the Pacific in 1869. Railroad surveyors were trespassing on lands the Indians considered theirs. The number of battles between the U.S. Calvary and the western Indian tribes had been sporadic but accelerating ever since the Civil War. As the Whlte Man pressed westward the conflict gained momen-tum, and the friction and hatred between the Red Man and the White Man increased. One of the most hated by the Indian tribes was the colorful and dashing Col. George A. Custer himself, whom they call-ed Yellow Hair. They did not forget his no-holds barred attack on Chief Black Kettle's village on the Washita River Nov. 27, 1868. In this charge through the Cheyenne's camp, Custer's men kiiled 103 Indians, including Chief Black Kettle himself. The culmination of this sporadic, but unfocused warfare came to a climax on June 25, 1876, at the Battle of the little Big Horn in Montana. In this encounter a conglomerate of approximately 5000 Indians, mostly Sioux and Cheyenne, led Custer's contingent of cavalry in to a trap. As at Thermopylae in 480 B.C.E., and at the Alamo in 1836, the White Man made a gallant stand and fought to the last man. All 225 cavalrymen, including Custer himself, were massacred. The news of the massacre hit the nation's capital like a thunderclap when it was publicly announced on July 4, 1876, as the nation was celebrating its first Centennial. It led to the galvanlza-tion of public opinion and the White Man's determinadon to settle The "Indian question" once and for all. The U.S. Army went about it in earnest and the back of the Indian resistance was broken at 120 Wounded Knee on Dec. 29, 1890. In thls short-lived skirmish, in which the 7th Cavalry again participated, the White Man lost one officer, six non-commissioned officers, and 18 privates. It is not known how many Indians were killed, since many escaped and died. elsewhere, but 146 Indians were interred in a huge trench on the bat-tlefield by the burial detail. So ended ignomlnously the resistance of the Indians in a botched-up battle that was of little credit to either side. It ended in a whimper for the Indians, and their mixed, mongrelized and debauched descendants, and they have been whimpering ever since. There are some hard and eternal lessons the White race could and should learn from its centuries-old experience with the Indians on the American Condnent: 1 . The first and foremost lesson is that the White Man, when overwhelmed by superior numbers of mud races, can be massacred and wiped out, even though at the last minute he chooses to fight, even though he fights heroically. This happened at the Alamo, It happened in San Domingo (see Creotive Credo No. 30, "The Grisly Lesson of San Domingo," in the White Man's Bible). It has happened time and again in the histroy of the white Race. 2. The race issue is the foremost and most overwhelm-ing issue in histroy. It has been with us since the dawn of civilization and will remain with the White Race until it resolutely decides to resolve it in its own favor, as ad-vocated by the Church Of The Creator; or, for lack of resolution or determination it will be solved by its enemies with the total destruction of the White Race on worldwide scale. Such a program of genocide is now in high gear, and if not reversed promptly the White Race will be finished within the next generation. The polyglot United Nations gleefully predicts that in another genra-tion the White Race wlll be outnumbered in a ratio of 49 to 1. 3. A weak, wavering and pusillanimous attitude by the White Race toward the racial issue will not solve the problem, nor will it appease our enemies. No amount of concessions on our part will mitigate the fatred of the Jews and the mud races towards us. They will not now, or ever, agree to live and let live as far as the White Race is concerned. Their hatred is eternal until the White Race is wiped out, at which time the races will again turn on eachother, as did the Indians before the arrival of the White Man. 4. In this ongoing battle of the races are three possible outcomes as far as the White Race is concerned. (a) The White Race will be browned, mongrelized without a confrontation, without offering a fight, thereby 121 losing its divine seed and becoming extinct. This is the linger-ing death, the most horrible, the most shameful, the most ig-nominous of all posslble ends. We ot the Church Of The Creator de-nounce and deplore such a course as the worst of all non-decisions and would much sooner face a confrontation and fight to the last man if necessary, as did the valiant men of the Alamo, as did Custer's gallant 7th Calvary. (b) The Whlte Race will be sitting idly by while the mud races expand in a population explosion as never before witnessed in history. The mud races will then turn on the reduced numbers of the White Race and massacre them at the propitious moment, such timing organized and orchestrated by the sinister Jewish Powerhouse. This is what happened in San Domingo, in the Belglan Congo, in Angola, in Rhodesia, and is rapidly coming to a climax in South Africa. It also happened in formerly French Indo-China, and a number of other areas of the World that the White Man controlled as late as a decade after W.W.II, but these lessons have never been publicized or brought home to the White Race. (c) The third and only alternative that we of the Church Of The Creator consider as even worthy of entertaining is unabashed, total, victory for the White Race. In this matter I want to quote two famous generals of this century. General MacArthur said it all when he observed "There is no substitute for victory." We agree whole heartedly. We Creators have taken this position from the beginning and have no reservations about it whatsoever. We want total vic-tory for the White Race until we inhabit all the good lands of the, Planet Earth - exclusively. There is no compromising, no appeasing, no peaceful living side by side with the mud races, the Jews and all the parasites. We do not make this choice arbitrarily. History and Nature have made this choice for us and demonstrated clearly that there is only one other choice - only death. Speaking of dying, I now want to quote another general as col-orful and dashing as was Gen. Custer. General George A. Patton said "Instead of dying for yoar country, make sure the enemy dies for his country." The point is that instead of making a desperate, unplanned and unprepared last-ditch stand and being wiped out (as was Custer's valiant band) let us do it differently. Let us realisticaIly confront the situation and prepare and act accordingly. We are not helpless, at least not yet in 1985. The situation is there for every one to see. It is clear as day. All you have to do is look. When I wrote NATURE'S ETERNAL RELIGION in 1971 I predicted (among other items) the demise of two White dominated South African countries, namely Rhodesia, and the Republic of South Africa, because of their tolerant but rather stupid racial policies, (but 122 no more so than the U.S.). Rhodesia has now been fully niggerized and the White Man massacred and/or driven out, as South Africa soon will be. I remember attending a lecture at the sumptuous home of the late Countess Guardabassa in Palm Beach, Florida in the early 70's. The speaker was the late Carol Dunn of LIBERTY LOBBY. I remember her ebullient report on how wonderful things were in Rhodesia, what a beautiful clean city was Sallsbuby, one of the was little cities in the world. All these bad reports of the world press about Rhodesia mistreating the blacks were all wrong. Why Rhodesia was doing everything possible for the blacks, givlng them work, giving them homes, trying to educate them, and as some (mulattoes, no doubt) got a sctntilla of education, they were taught to partake in, and given, an ever increasing role in the government itself. To hear her gush and bubble with optimism, Rhodesia was a nigger's paradise, and it probably was, or is as close as the niggers can ever realistically wish for. Anyway, she, too, thought it was great and the world at large was all wrong in heaping condemnation on Rhodesia's alleged mistreatment of the blacks. In an area that was built by the White Man and that a century ago had very few aborigines, the niggers at that time (1970) already outnumbered the Whites 16 to 1. A friend of mine and I privately discussed her speech later. We came to the (then) astounding concluslon that Rhodesia was ac-tually "farming niggers", in short feeding and breeding them at a rate that woild soon consume the country. And that is just what happened. Even at that time (1970) I suspected that Ian Smith, the then darling of the Kosher Konservatives, was a race traitor and selling the Whites down the river. History proved I was right. We now come to Rhodesia only a decade later and what do we find? Rhodesia is no more. The land is still there but the White Man is no longer in control, nor in existence, except for a few toadies that hold the ruins together, such as they are. The "country" is now called Zimbabwe and the once clean, beautiful city of Salisbury is called Harare. Two rival gangs of black savages are now fighting each other for control of the corpse. There is an article in the January 13, (85) Atlanta Constitution telling about the peculiar political work-ings of black "democracy" in that now nigger dominated country. It seems that opposition leader Joshua Nkomo came into town for a campaign stop in Harare and supporters of Prime Minister Robert Magabe fired nine bullets into his bullet proof car and hurled an avalanche of rocks to properly top it off in true niggerly fashion. This is black 'uhuru"(freedom) at its best and even that shabby structure will survive only as long as the White taxpayers of the United States
123 can be kept snookered Into subsidizing these useless savages to the tune of hundreds of millions. The Republic of South Africa is larger and more formidable than was little Rhodesia, but it is doing down the same track to black oblivion as did Rhodesia a few years earlier. We have the same techniques belng utilized by the Jewish powerhouse, same slogans, the same accusations and the same line of traitors undermining the structure from the inside. The finances, the news media and the government of South Africa are in the hands of the Jewish Oppenheimer family and their racial cohorts who own the vast DeBeers gold and diamond mines, and just about everything else in South Atrica. Manipulating him on a string, the Jews have placed their own puppet at the head of the South African government. The treachery of Prime Minister P. W. Botha is matched (or perhaps exceeded) by the lowest of all human cretins - the race traitor from our own coun-try who is now "visiting" that nigger-plagued country and agitating the stupid brutish animals. His name happenes to be Senetor Edward Kennedy, who is following in the footsteps of his late brother Robert who was in South Africa on a similar "Hate Whitey" mission nineteen years eariler. Lately I listened to "CROSSFIRE", a nightly program where a celebrity or public figure is interviewed by Tom Braden "on the left and Pat Buchanan "on the Right", supposedly representing two diametrically opposed views. They play a good game on the average boob-tube yokel who is easlly convinced that he is genuinely hear-ing both sides from diametrically opposed viewpoints. This particular night they had the South African Ambassador to the U.S. on the hotseat, with Pat Buchanan supposedly defending the Ambassador, and the Ambassador supposedly defending apartheid and the Republic Of South Africa's position. To an ex-perienced observer it seemed exceedingly shange how the two defenders consistently falled to review the grisly fate that befell the White citizens of the Belgian Congo, of Angola, or Rhodesia, when the black savages took over. At best they quibbled over the academic issue of "rights" and other demagogic trappery but never considered the fate or the interests of the White people. Tom Braden "on the left", however, kept admonishing repeatedly the impending horrors of race war (horrible! horrible! horrlble!) unless the niggers got it all, and such race war was to be avoided at all costs, even though the Whites who built the country went down the drain, even though civilization reverted back to the barbarism of the savage. Which brings me to a vital point In this dissertation. Why is it that when the consequences of a confrontation between Whites and Whites (such as World War II) may be a 124 worldwide war of horrendous dimensions, there is no hesitation whatsoever about promoting it? In fact, they can't get such wars going fast enough. However, when a race war might be engendered, a war that would be short and strictly limited, with the White Race coming out as an easy winner, then oh, my god, perish the thought! Such horrors are unthinkable! When 350000 of the best White people were incinerated in a matter of a few days by "Allied" bombing raids over Dresden, Germany, during 1945, the blubbering, bleeding hearts were not parttcularly upset. But when so much as one deserving nigger gets killed, all hell breaks loose. Why is that, you might ask? The answer is plain. A worldwide war behween Whites such as in W.W.II kills millions of Whites. There is nothing more efficent than Whites killing Whites. Nothing could make the Jews happier. A race war in the U.S.A., or in South Africa however, would klll only a few White, but it would total-ly wipe out the niggers, and the race problem would be solved. This, of course, the Jews don't want. The Jews are looking forward to a race war alright, but they are nursing and delaying the situation until time as they have totally soften up the White Man's will to fight and reduced their numbers to where (like Custer) they would be wiped out even if they did have the will to fight. Each day that goes by the balance is shifting more to the benefit of the mud races, as their numbers increase, as the White Race shrinks, and as the White Race becomes pathologically more and more drugged into the stupor of a Zombie. Hence the delay. But the race war is coming whether we like it or not, and it will come as soon as the mud races and the Jews are ready - and it will be bloody. Tbe White Race has never really had a firm, consistent policy regarding its position towards the Jews and the mud races except for the brief perlod during Hitler's regime in Germany. Even in Mussolini's Fascist Italy, race was not reaily the issue, but rather the issue focused on the relationship between the state and the in-dividual. The policy of the United States government towards the Indians, even during and before the nineteenth centure, was one of vacillation and indecision, becoming softer and more pro-Indian as time went on until today one Indian is worth twenty White Men in the eyes of the Jewish occupational government. On this issue, as always, Jewish Christianity was constantly in-voked about how we MUST love our human fellow men, how we are all God's children and how we are all equal (oh, so damned equal!) in the eyes of the Lord. Strangely, when the Christians were fighting each other in the Thirty Years War and all the other religious wars, no such pangs of conscience were invoked, 125not in the Civll War, nor in W.W.I or in W.W.II, when the White Man was slaughtering White Men by the millions. Do you get the picture? It is high time we come to our senses, protect our own, get the parasites off our back and crowd the mud races into oblivion. We Creators are not advocating a policy of going out and slaughtering anybody, not even Jews or niggers. What we are saying is: let us stop subsidizing these lethal parasites and they will soon wither on the vine of their own accord. Let us polarize around our own racial religion and let the mud races fend for themselves, If they can. Only when they (the Jews and the mud races) stop us from exer-cising our constitutional and our natural rights and wage an attack against us, then, an only then, will we spring to our own defense and heap retibuition and warfare against our enemies. (Read again Creative Credo No. 64 in the WHITE MAN'S BIBLE entitled "Law and order us. Violence Terrorism and Self-preservation", esp. Article No. 8 regarding our official position).
CREATIVITY has it all, says it all.
Help build a Whiter and Brighter World Become a militant Creator.
lf the White Race is ever to revert back to sanity, Christianity will HAVE TO GO. To again regain its sanity, it will first have to dump Christianity.
For the White Race Creativity is the Great Quantum Leap Foward from out of the present Jewish quagmire. lt is equiualent to what the Renaissance was to the Dark Ages.
School for Gifted Boys Progress Report
The construction part of the School for Gifted Boys is practical-ly finished. There are still a number of accommodations that need to be done. We still have to get most of the equipment for the kitchen. That is - a stove, venting hood, refrigerator, freezer and a number of other items. Because we have to meet Health Department and National Sanitation Foundation standards, everything has to be of-ficially approved, and is three times as expensive as it need be. It is not good enough to buy good equipment, it has to go through the red tape and be approved. We sttill need beds, tables and a host of other furnishings, all of which are extremely costly. We need your support, your donations, your help and your participation. We plan to start the first two week session after July 4, namely the two weeks from July 6 to July 20. The cost per student for the two week session, room & board, instruction and activities is expected to be $300, a modest fee that will not cover our expenses, but we need to get started. Please spread the word and get as many pro-spective candidates as possible that we may contact. Although we intend to be more restrictive in the future, we will be glad to accept all good White boys and youths between the ages of 10 and 20. Help make the inital session a success!
What you can do to Help. 1. If you have a boy of your own, or a nephew or a grandson, the beat gift you can make to the remainder of his life is to get him properly oriented - racially and religiously. Send him to our school. 2. Sonsor a good White boy even if not a relative of yours. The long term benefits can be tremendous for the individual and our race. Remember, if we don't save the White Race your money won'y be worth a tinkers dam anyway.
127 Critique Of A Critique
Mr. Richard S. Hoehler is a writer and a phllosopher who has written several books on the sub]ect of philosophy, Jews and Na-tional Socialism. He is domiciled in Colorado and a writer of con-siderable talent. Recently he submitted an article, a critique if you will, of the Creativity Movement, and since we respect Mr. Hoehler's appraisal we printed the article on the front page of Racial Loyalty No. 19. We believe that a healthy exchange of criticism is always a con-structive process in that it either calls forth a re-examination and correction of any faults, defects or shortcomings, or it provides an excellent opportunity to explain a perfertly valid position, or posi-tions that may be grossly misunderstood or misrepresented by the critic and/or the world at large. Aher all, nobody is perfect, nobody has all the answers, and least of all the critics themselves. As anyone knows, it is much easler to criticize than to break new ground and build something meaninqful, whether it be a skyscraper, or a new movement or a new religion. Within this framework, I want to answer some of the cridcisms that Mr. Hoehler has raised, not so much for Mr. Hoehler's benefit, but or the benefit of all our readers, supporters and members. I want to do so because I feel that the questions raised reflect views that are commonly bandied about, not so much by our active supporters and members, but by spectators on the outside, that group we have often referred to as the arm-chair intelligentsia. Whereas I respect Mr. Hoehler's philosophy and writings, I must make it clear that he is not a member of the Church Of The Creator, and has never made any positive contributions to the movement. His leanings are more towards National Soclalism, but I do not know whether he belongs to any such group either. Be that as it may, let us, in a spirit of good will and with an open mind, take a look at what Mr. Hoehler had to say about CREATIVI-TY, and what our correct position is towards each Issue. Before I do so, I want to make a eriticism of Mr. Hoehler's writings in general and the Dec. 1984 article in particular, and it is this: Some of his statements are so vague one is left wondering what he means, or how, if at all, it applies to the question at hand. As we used to say when I was in the Florida Legislature: "Your point is so subtle it completely escapes me" This is, at least one criticism that has never been leveled at me. On the contrary, most people have criticized me by saying that: "You certainly make it perfectly clear as to where you stand, perhaps too clear."
128 Now we come to some of the points that we do understand, or think we do. 1."One fellow I know claims you are 'too Jewish' for his taste. Curiously enough an objective observer could point out certain features of your stand which are both histortically or culturally Jewish in flavor". Alright, let us look at this general broadside. let me say at the outset that it is hard to account for some people's, tastes, especially when I don't know who this fellow is for whose taste I may be "too Jewish". But tastes come in more varieties than Howard Johnson's 28 flavors of ice cream, and some of the tastes on the modern seene are extremely bizarre and repugnant. We have sex perverts, we have people who "adore" Michael Jackson, people who hate Hitler. Need I go on? We are not going to try to accommodate all tastes, or any, for that matter. If CREATIVITY is not their tasty dish, let thern dine elsewhere. The world is fulI of alternatives, most of which are Jewish garbage. In fact, all I intend to do is call it as I see it, and try to wipe the Jewish pestilence from off the face of the earth. However, the poInt is that evidently Mr. Hoehler agrees with this "fellow", whoever he is, because he goes on to say: 2."Sarcasm ond cynicism are prime Jewish psychological weopons". Perhaps so, Mr. Hoehler, but no mnre so than words, pro-paganda, religion, money, terrorism, military hardware and a million other weapons that are used by Jews and non-Jews alike in order to prevail over their enemies and survive. You yourself extensively use sarcasm and cynicism in your writings. Even our common idol, Adolf Hitler, used them all extensively, all the way from sarcasm to military hardware in order to prevail, and only a fool would allow himself to be willingly divested of all the useful waeapons at his disposal because somebody might accuse him of using weapons us-ed by the Jews. We have no intentions of voluntarily disarming ourselves so our enemies can make mincemeat out uf us. (Read again "Self-imposed Handicaps" in Issue No. 6 of Expanding Creativity) 3. This brings me to the crux of Mr. Hoehlor's criticism. "Beware in fighting with monsters lest you yourself become a monster!" he says, quoting Nietsche. How cute! The alternative that is not men-ioned is to evidently let the monster devour you. So I am glad this issue was raised because it is one of the silliest shibboleths that has ever been bandied about, and in answer let me draw you a picture. If you were part of an army that was provided with nothing more than slingshots and you were engaged in a life and death battle with m opposition army that was armed with marhine guns. you would, believe, be at a serious disadvantage, to say the least. Now if your 129 dumb leader sald to you "yes, we too could obtain machine guns, but heaven forbid, we don't want to be like our enemies, and we will therefore do the honorable thing. We will faithfully stick with our slingshots, even though we are wiped out to a man". That would be pretty dumb, wouldn't it? In fact, suicidal We CREATORS don't intend to commit suicide and we are not dumb enough to have our prime weapons struck out of our hands. (Read again Knocking the Key Weapon from out of the Enemy's Hands", in R.L. No. 17 in this book). No indeed, if the enemy is us-ing machine guns and has weapons superior to ours, we want to make damn sure we not only avail ourselves of machine guns too, but also that ours are superior to the enemy's, and add to that a whole shop-ping list of other superior weapons - mortars, cannons, tanks, air-craft, bombers, or whatever it takes. That is, in fact, our position: we will do whatever it takes, and to hell with the slingshot advocates. It is here that I want to reveal a crucial observation to Mr. Hoehler: I have learned more from the Jews, from Jewish weapons and tactics than have from all the White scholars, presidents and philosophers put together, and I have no hesitation, apologies and no compunction about saying so. The Jews, a small parasitic minority, have survived for 5000 years and now own and control the world. It behooves us to study how they have done it and utilize the same effective and powerful weapons. This I have done and it is all polarized into a White racial religion. If that is "too Jewish" for some fellow's "taste", that is too bad, but I say to hell with hanging onto the slingshots. We are determined to SUR-VIVE AND WIN, and use whatever weapons it takes. 4. We now come to one of the weakest and most indefensible of all charges levelled at us, and that is Mr. Hoehler's criticism of our SALUBRIOS5 LIVING approach to good health and a sound mind. Evidently such an attitude, too, is Jewish, and see, therefore we should not "concem ourselves with dietary rules". Why? Because Mr. Hoehler says, it is Jewish brain-rot and as con-clusive evidence he cites Ralph Waldo Emerson's quotation: "A good mind can nourish himself on a broth of boiled shoes, if need be!" Well, I didn't know Emerson said that, but l'll take Mr. Hoehler's word for it, and make a comment of my own. If Emerson did say that, it was one of the most stupid remarks he ever made, and evidently Emerson was completely Ignorant of the scientific informa-tion now available about how to nuriure a healthy body and a sound mind. He evidently was also grossly ignorant about certain rules of living that can ruin not only a healthy body, but also the mind that inhabits that body. Surely, even the most naive and uninformed will admit that such rules exist. Surely no individual a indifferent
130 as to whether his mind and body are in excellent health, whether they are functioning efficiently and effectively, as to whether they are imbued with a good feeling of energy and well being, or whether on the other hand they feel sick, despondent, suicidal, their body racked with pain and lathargy. There is a difference, isn't there? And surely, what you ingest into your body makes a difference. How you treat your body, whether you treat it intelligently or abuse it like a wanton fool, does make a difference, doesn't it? Whether you "nourish" your body with boiled shoe leather, cocaine, smoke pot, smoke tobacco, or consume 100 to 200 pounds of sugar a year does make one hell of a differece. We CREATORS call that difference "Salubrious Living". We have reviewed just one chapter, namely Chapter 8 of our book of the same name nn this important subject. We hope it will help some uninformed people to begin educating themselves for their own benefit. But let us not be too hard on Mr. Emerson. He is not alone among the intelligentsia who are compIetely screwed up in their ap-proach to health and common sense. There are millions of them still wandering the earth today who may know everything about the 18th Dynasty that ruled Egypt several thousand years ago, but are com-pletely ignorant regarding the first constructive rule about taking care of their own bodies, the same bodies that house their closed minds, and both suffer much as a result. There are more hundreds of millions meandering the face of the earth who gorge on toxic junk foods, overf-ed and undernourished. Most of them are obese, lethargic, loaded with chemical toxins, Inviting cancer and all the other degenerative diseases of civllization. As George Dietz has said repeatedly, "Those who will not read have no advantage over those who cannot". No indeed, Mr. Hoehler, SALUBRIOUS LIVING is NOT Jewish. It Is just plain, good common sense. The A.M.A. and their medical dogma of drugs, chemicals, polsons and the whole mess of unnatural toxins is Jewish. It causes cancer, diabetes, heart disease and a whole plethora of so-called degenerative diseases that our "civilization" is aflicted with, but rarely found among the primitive races of mankind. the "approved" A.M.A. treatent of cancer, for instance, is cut, burn, and poison. THAT IS JEWISH. But living in accordance with, and in harmnny with the Laws of Nature, and taking care of our health, our mind, our society, our gene pool and our environment is about as un-Jewieh as you can get. It is strictly CREATIVE, strictly aIl White, and that is what CREATVITY is all about. The fact that the primitive ignorant Jews may have imbedded some stupid dietary superstitions in their perverted gutter religion does not in the least deter, or discourage us from using common sense in understanding and applying the Laws of Nature. My only regret is that I was not apprised of this extremely
131 important body of knowledge when I was a child, Instead of being misled by Jew-trained doctors for most of my adult life. I somcerely regret that only late in life did I stumble onto this vital area of human knowledge, when I could have enjoyed the benefits thereof from the day I was born. But as Adolf Hitler said - "There are truths lying around on the streets, but few people will recognize them." Let us repeat: those who wIIl not read - the closed mind - the sick mind. We now come to tbe religion that CREATIVITY something in common with Judaism because somehow we embrace "monotheism". This is exceedingly strange since this im-plies that we CREATORS too embrace the "One God" thesis, when we are one of the foremost advocates of dumping spookcraft - all spookcrafts. Not only that, but evidently when we try to solve an over-whelmlng world problem - namely the Jewish pestilence - by us-ing logic, by being rational, by using our brains, by trying to organize a systematic and effective counter-force to the Jewish power establishment, this is evldently deemed extremely bad, and brands us as being cold and unemotional. Evidentely, Mr. Hoehler goes along with other simllar critics and implies that we should be irrational, ilIogical and silly about the whole thing, play childish games instead and employ the help of imaginary spooks to do the job for us. If we don't we are cold and unemotional. Not only that but the more of a muddled mish-mash we can drag into the plcture, why the hap-pier everybody will be, whether we get the job done or not. seems to be the Implied alternative to CREATIVITY. Well, we will not be hoodwinked or misIed down a blind alley. (Read again: "A Polyglot Mind and a Polyglot Society - Who Needs Them?" ln Issue No. 10 of Expanding Creatiuity). For too long the White Race has been aimlessly wandering in a pointless disorganiz-ed sea of confusion, a muddled mish-mash of meaningless Jewish shibboleths, and it has led to nothing but unmitigated disaster for the White Race. Believe me, just because we are trying to be rational, factual, logical, organized and systematic in solving a dire problem does not mean we are unemotional. By no means. We CREATORS can get as fired up as anybody, if not more so. But that doesn't mean we must be silly and confused about it. We aim to concentrate and direct that fire effectively at the target. (Read again "The Time has come for the White Race to establish its own Pole Star". in Issue No. 20 of this book). In conclusion, let me say this: We CREATORS are not in the business of trying to impress anyone, or to entertain anyone. We mean to get an important job done, and sacrifice whatever it takes, do whatever it takes. If we have learned some successful tactics from the Jews and use their own weapons against them, why that's great.
132 That does not make us Jewish in the least. It only means that we deplore the slingshot syndrome. There is one major difference between the White Race and the Jews that will always re-main - and that is: The Jews are eternal parasites and can only survive on the backs of a productive host. On the other hand, we CREATORS are builders and producers and need no help from any of theother raaces, least of all parasites and other mud races, and we seek to build a Whiter and Brighter World for our own kind. This attitude will make a lot of Christians, bleeding hearts, muddle-headed hyprocrites, mealy-mouthed sentimentalists, dopeheads, cowards and sycophants mad. That's too damn bad. But now that we have found our Pole Star we will remain on our course, we will remain factual, rational, logical and determined to do the Job that must be done. We are interested only in those stout he hearts that will help us get that awesome job done, and have little interest in those who have nothing better to do than throw roadblocks in our way.
We Creators would rather be promoting a cause that may be unpopular at this time but will win in the end, than one that may be populur now but lose in the end.
The biggest problem we have to contend with (and correct) is the screwed up thinking of the White Race itself.